Verdict tracker: engineered-stone silicosis trials in the United States

Every jury verdict this project has been able to document, with damages, fault allocation and what happened next. Most cases settle privately and never appear here.

Published 12 September 2026Sources last checked 12 September 20265 recordsDownload: CSV JSON

5
trials to verdict
4
plaintiff verdicts
1
defense verdict
$124.02 million
total damages assessed by juries (before any reduction)

Read the amounts carefully. A jury's damages figure is not what a plaintiff receives. Under California's comparative-fault rules a defendant found 3% at fault owes 3% of the non-economic damages (economic damages remain joint and several); large shares of fault were allocated to employers and to companies that settled before trial. Verdicts can be reduced or reversed after trial. None of the post-trial outcomes below has been confirmed by this project from a court record.

Summary table

VerdictCourtPlaintiffDefendants at trialOutcomeDamagesStatus
7 August 2024Superior Court of California, County of Los AngelesGustavo Reyes GonzalezCaesarstone USA, Inc.; Cambria Company LLC; Color Marble, Inc.Plaintiff$52,437,366Verified: secondary source
29 May 2025Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Torrance)Wendy Solano Claustro et al. (decedent Jose Raul Garcia-Leon)Caesarstone Ltd.; Caesarstone USA, Inc.DefenseNoneReported by an interested party
30 April 2026District Court, City and County of DenverTyler Jordan and Caitlin JordanCambria Company LLC; Hyundai L&C USA, LLC; Caesarstone USA, Inc.; DuPont (EIDP); Makita USAPlaintiff$17,450,000Reported by an interested party
3 August 2026Superior Court of California, County of Los AngelesFamily of Willmer Ruben Martinez ParedesDal-Tile LLC; Dal-Tile Distribution, LLCPlaintiff$47,035,380Reported by an interested party
19 August 2026Superior Court of California, County of OrangeFamily of Gerardo Ramirez-SorianoDal-Tile Distribution, LLC; Dal-Tile Tennessee, LLC; Paragon Industries, Inc. (Bedrosians)Plaintiff$7,100,000Reported by an interested party
How to read the verification labels
Verified: primary source
Checked by this project against a court record, statute, agency publication or journal index.
Verified: secondary source
Checked against a major news organisation, professional body or university publication.
Reported by an interested party
Rests on a law-firm release, trade press or legal-marketing site. Treat figures as claims until independently confirmed.
Unverified
Listed for completeness; not yet checked against any source by this project.

Tier numbers next to sources (T1 to T4) follow the source hierarchy in the methodology: T1 primary records and agencies, T2 major news and professional bodies, T3 interested parties, T4 discovery-only.

Records

7 August 2024: Reyes-Gonzalez v. Aaroha Radiant Marble & Granite Slabs et al.

Verified: secondary source First US engineered-stone silicosis trial verdict

Court
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, No. 22STCV31907, Judge William F. Fahey
Plaintiff
Gustavo Reyes Gonzalez. Countertop fabricator, Los Angeles and Orange counties, about 15 years.
Diagnosis
Accelerated silicosis; double lung transplant February 2023
Defendants at trial
Caesarstone USA, Inc.; Cambria Company LLC; Color Marble, Inc.
Outcome
Verdict for the plaintiff (four days after a roughly month-long trial)
Total damages
$52,437,366
Economic
$8,257,366
Non-economic
$44,180,000
Damages notes
Non-economic: $21,565,000 past and $22,615,000 future.
Fault allocation
Caesarstone 15%; Cambria 10%; Color Marble 2.5%; Plaintiff 2.5%; All others (not at trial) 70%
Findings
Failure to warn (per plaintiff counsel); jury form not reviewed
Post-trial
Cambria said it would explore appellate options; outcome not verified
Plaintiff counsel
Brayton Purcell LLP (Gilbert Purcell, James Nevin, Daniel Morse, Gabriela Munoz-Gomez); Metzger Law Group (Raphael Metzger, Scott Brust)
Defense counsel
Peter Strotz (lead counsel for Caesarstone; firm per later reports King & Spalding)
Sources
Public Health WatchT2Stone UpdateT3Brayton Purcell LLP via PR NewswireT3
Last checked
12 September 2026

First engineered-stone silicosis case tried to verdict in the United States. Case number, filing date and judge come from search-index excerpts of the Daily Journal and legal-marketing summaries and have not been checked against the LASC docket.

29 May 2025: Solano Claustro et al. v. Caesarstone Ltd., Caesarstone USA, Inc., et al. (wrongful death of Jose Raul Garcia-Leon)

Reported by an interested party Second US trial; only defense verdict to date

Court
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Torrance), Judge Eric C. Taylor
Plaintiff
Wendy Solano Claustro et al. (decedent Jose Raul Garcia-Leon). Countertop fabricator and installer, 1996 to 2022.
Diagnosis
Silicosis; died 16 February 2023
Defendants at trial
Caesarstone Ltd.; Caesarstone USA, Inc.
Outcome
Verdict for the defense (less than one day)
Total damages
$0
Damages notes
No damages; jury found no negligence and no design defect.
Post-trial
Not verified
Defense counsel
King & Spalding LLP (Peter A. Strotz, Bryan L. King, Michael Mosher)
Sources
King & Spalding LLPT3Daily JournalT2
Last checked
12 September 2026

Only United States engineered-stone silicosis trial to date decided for the defense. Failure-to-warn and punitive-damages claims were removed by nonsuit; plaintiffs dropped fraudulent concealment; the jury found no negligence and no design defect after less than a day of deliberation. Primary detail comes from defense counsel's release; the Daily Journal report is paywalled.

30 April 2026: Tyler Jordan and Caitlin Jordan v. Cambria Company LLC et al.

Reported by an interested party Third US trial; first in Colorado

Court
District Court, City and County of Denver, No. 2024CV31180, Judge Sarah B. Wallace
Plaintiff
Tyler Jordan and Caitlin Jordan. Fabricator at Jordan Marble and Granite (family shop), about 10 years.
Diagnosis
Artificial-stone silicosis and silica-associated chronic kidney disease
Defendants at trial
Cambria Company LLC; Hyundai L&C USA, LLC; Caesarstone USA, Inc.; DuPont (EIDP); Makita USA
Outcome
Verdict for the plaintiff
Total damages
$17,450,000
Economic
$7,600,000
Non-economic
$1,650,000
Other
$8,200,000
Damages notes
Other: $7,600,000 physical impairment and $600,000 spousal loss of consortium. Trade press headline of $16.8 million excludes the consortium award.
Fault allocation
Jordan Marble and Granite (employer, not a defendant) 63%; Cambria 32%; Hyundai L&C USA 3%; Plaintiff 2%
Findings
Misrepresentation (Cambria); Negligence and misrepresentation (Hyundai L&C); Caesarstone, DuPont and Makita not liable
Post-trial
Cambria announced an intention to appeal
Plaintiff counsel
Brayton Purcell LLP
Defense counsel
Womble Bond Dickinson (for Cambria, per firm release)
Sources
Brayton Purcell LLP via PR NewswireT3Stone UpdateT3Womble Bond DickinsonT3
Last checked
12 September 2026

First artificial-stone silicosis case filed in Colorado and third in the country to reach verdict. Jury findings: Cambria liable for misrepresentation (32% of fault), Hyundai L&C for negligence (3%), employer Jordan Marble and Granite 63%, plaintiff 2%; Caesarstone, DuPont and Makita found not responsible. Defense counsel's release title states the jury found Cambria not negligent and its products not defective; the misrepresentation finding stands alongside that.

3 August 2026: Evelin Liseth Gonzales Rodriguez v. Dal-Tile LLC et al. (wrongful death of Willmer Ruben Martinez Paredes)

Reported by an interested party Fourth US trial; third plaintiff verdict

Court
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Plaintiff
Family of Willmer Ruben Martinez Paredes. Countertop fabricator.
Diagnosis
Artificial-stone silicosis, silicosis-linked rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune disease; death
Defendants at trial
Dal-Tile LLC; Dal-Tile Distribution, LLC
Outcome
Verdict for the plaintiff
Total damages
$47,035,380
Economic
$2,035,380
Non-economic
$45,000,000
Damages notes
Trade press itemisation: $322,000 medical care, $88,000 income loss, $20,000,000 pre-death pain and suffering, $1,625,380 economic loss to family, $25,000,000 non-economic loss to family.
Fault allocation
Art in Art Marble/Granite (employer) 35%; Precious Stone Inc. (employer) 35%; Dal-Tile LLC 3%; Dal-Tile Distribution 3%; Four settled defendants incl. Caesarstone and Cambria 24%; Decedent 0%
Findings
Negligence; Design defect; Failure to warn
Post-trial
Not verified
Plaintiff counsel
Brayton Purcell LLP
Sources
Brayton Purcell LLPT3Stone UpdateT3
Last checked
12 September 2026

Fourth United States trial and third plaintiff verdict. Fault: 3% to each Dal-Tile entity, 70% to the decedent's former employers (35% each to Art in Art Marble/Granite and Precious Stone Inc.), 6% to each of four settled defendants, 0% to the decedent. Sources are plaintiff counsel and trade press; no court record reviewed.

19 August 2026: Estate/family of Gerardo Ramirez-Soriano v. Dal-Tile Distribution, LLC, Dal-Tile Tennessee, LLC, Paragon Industries, Inc. (Bedrosians Tile & Stone) et al.

Reported by an interested party Fifth US trial; fourth plaintiff verdict (per plaintiff counsel)

Court
Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Plaintiff
Family of Gerardo Ramirez-Soriano. Countertop fabricator.
Diagnosis
Artificial-stone silicosis; death
Defendants at trial
Dal-Tile Distribution, LLC; Dal-Tile Tennessee, LLC; Paragon Industries, Inc. (Bedrosians)
Outcome
Verdict for the plaintiff
Total damages
$7,100,000
Economic
$2,400,000
Non-economic
$4,700,000
Fault allocation
Dal-Tile entities 2%; Paragon Industries 1%; Other manufacturers and suppliers (not at trial) 62%
Post-trial
Not verified
Plaintiff counsel
Brayton Purcell LLP (Heather-Ann Young, Diksha Chhetri)
Defense counsel
Foley Mansfield PLLP (Dustin Priebe, Ashley Nagashima, Waverly Shannon) for Dal-Tile; Theodora Oringher PC (Timothy Heggem, Gina Goldberg) for Paragon
Sources
Brayton Purcell LLPT3
Last checked
12 September 2026

Fifth United States trial and fourth plaintiff verdict, per plaintiff counsel. Fault: 2% Dal-Tile entities, 1% Paragon, 62% other manufacturers and suppliers not at trial; the remaining allocation was not reported. Only source is plaintiff counsel's release.

What this tracker does not show

Context for these numbers is in what silicosis cases have been worth and how silicosis lawsuits work. The companies involved are profiled in the defendant index.

This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Verdict figures describe what juries found in specific cases; they are not predictions for any other case. If you may have a claim, see finding an attorney.